ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic situation affected population health and lifestyle not only for a short period but also long period. Long COVID symptoms is a long-term illness after COVID condition. Long COVID symptoms greatly affected to quality of life of patients. Massage is a unique treatment form of alternative medicine that can promote health in various dimensions. From the previous studies, massage has affected to Long COVID mechanism via anti-inflammatory process, immune system enhancing process, and hormone level balancing that related to Long COVID symptoms as well as being able to reduce the symptoms of the long COVID symptoms. The study about the efficacy and safety of massage against Long COVID symptoms is the essential approach to increase the value of massage and develop health services in the future.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered serious challenges in the treatment of chronic diseases due to the lack of access to medical attention. Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) must have adequate treatment compliance in order to reach and maintain remission or low activity of their diseases. Treatment suspension because of non-medical reasons might lead to disease activation and organ damage.ObjectivesIdentify the frequency of biologic treatment (bDMARD) suspension in patients with RD during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine the associated factors for suspension.MethodsIn this study we included all patients registered in the Mexican Biologics Adverse Events Registry (BIOBADAMEX), that started bDMARD before March 2019 and suspended treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used descriptive statistic to analyze baseline characteristics and main treatment suspension causes. We used Chi[2] and Kruskal Wallis tests to analyze differences between groups.ResultsA total of 832 patients patients registered in BIOBADAMEX were included in this study, 143 (17%) suspended bDMARD during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main causes of suspension were inefficacy in 54 (38%) patients, followed by other motives in 49 (34%) patients from which 7 (5%) was loss of medical coverage. Adverse events and loss of patients to follow up were the motive in 16 (11%) and 15 (11%) patients respectively.When we compared the group that suspended bDMARD with the non-suspenders (Table 1), we found statistical differences in patient gender, with 125 (87%) female patients that suspended bDMARD, with a median age of 52 (42-60) years, and a treatment duration of 3.8 years.ConclusionIn our study we found that 17% of patients with RD suspended bDMARD treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and that non-medical motives such as lack of patients follow up and loss of medical coverage due to unemployment were important motives. These results are related to the effect of the pandemic on other chronic diseases.Table 1.Patients baseline characteristicsPatients that did not suspended bDMARD during pandemic (n = 689)Patients that suspended bDMARD during pandemic (n = 143)pFemale gender, n(%)549 (79.7)125 (87.4)0.02Age, median (IQR)55 (45 – 63)52 (42 – 60)0.04Body mass index, median (IQR)26.4 (23 – 30.4)27.23 (24.2 – 30.46)0.13Social security, n(%)589 (85.5)128 (89.5)0.2Diagnosis0.7- Rheumatoid arthritis444 (64.4)97 (67.8)- Juvenil idiopathic athritis29 (4.2)2 (1.4)- Ankyosing sponylitis93 (13.5)19 (13.3)- Psoriasic arthritis43 (6.2)6 (4.2)- Systemic lupus erithematosus32 (4.6)9 (6.3)- Others48 (6.9)10 (6.9)Disease duration, median (IQR)11 (7 – 19.5)12 (6 - 18)0.95Comorbidities, n(%)305 (44.3)73 (51)0.08Previos biologic, n(%)249 (36.1)60 (42)0.1Treatment at pandemic iniciation, n(%)0.8 - Etanercept a34 (4.9)5 (3.5)- Infliximab a24 (3.5)5 (3.5)- Adalimumab130 (18.9)22 (15.4)- Rituximab a61 (8.9)25 (17.5)- Abatacept76 (11)20 (14)- Tocilizumab82 (11.9)18 (12.6)- Certolizumab92 (13.4)28 (19.6)- Rituximab b7 (1)0- Golimumab36 (5.2)5 (3.5)- Tofacitinib14 (2)1 (0.7)- Infliximab b4 (0.5)2 (1.4)- Etanercept b31 (4.5)6 (4.2)- Baricitinib12 (1.7)1 (0.7)- Belimumab5 (0.7)1 (0.7)- Secukinumb8 (1.2)3 (2.1)Steroids use, n(%):254 (36.9)57 (39.9)0.2Steroids dose (mg), median (IQR)6 (5 – 10)6 (5 – 10)0.47DMARD use, n(%):538 (78.1)118 (82.5)0.1Treatment duration, median (IQR)5.06 (4.04 – 5.78)3.82 (3.35 – 4.95)0.001Suspension motive, n(%)NA- Inefficacy-54 (37.8)- Adverse event-16 (11.2)- Pregnancy-2 (1.4)- Loss of patient-15 (10.5)- Remission-7 (4.9)- Others-49 (34.2)Adverse events, n(%):102 (14.8)24 (16.8)0.3- Severe, n(%)13 (1.9)5 (3.5)0.4a original, b biosimilarREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsVijaya Rivera Teran: None declared, Daniel Xavier Xibille Friedmann: None declared, David Vega-Morales: None declared, Sandra Sicsik: None declared, Angel Castillo Ortiz: None declared, Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos: None declared, Dafhne Miranda: None declared, Iris Jazmin Colunga-Pedraza: None declared, Julio Cesar Casasola: None declared, Omar Elo Muñoz-Monroy: None declared, Sandra Carrilo: None declared, Angélica Peña: None declared, Sergio Duran Barragan: None declared, Luis Francisco Valdés Corona: None declared, Estefanía Torres Valdéz: None declared, Azucena Ramos: None declared, Aleni Paz: None declared, ERICK ADRIAN ZAMORA-TEHOZOL: None declared, Deshire Alpizar-Rodriguez Employee of: Scientific Advisor in GSK México.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis study aims to identify comfort food (CF) consumption and its associated factors during the pandemic period. The study also involves an online survey conducted five months after the quarantine started in Brazil. Design/methodology/approachData on lifestyle, eating habits and anthropometric data were collected before and during the pandemic, and the differences in these habits were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify predictors of CF consumption by gender. FindingsA total of 1,363 individuals were included in the sample, with a median age of 31 years old, of whom 80.3% were women. Since individuals were free to respond about the food consumed without predetermined categories, it was possible to carry out a faithful assessment of the occurrence of this behavior. At the same time, allowing the subjectivity and symbolism inherent to the concept of CF to be embraced. CF consumption was present for 54%, with "sweets" being the most mentioned group by both genders. The factors associated with CF consumption in women during the pandemic were increased snacking, increased bread, candies and alcoholic beverage intake, increased time spent at work, worsened sleep quality, reduced meals, perceived stress (PS), emotional eating (EE), age and increased frequency of meat intake. In men, the predictors for CF consumption were remote full-time work/study, PS, EE and early waking time. For both genders, CF consumption during the pandemic period was associated with PS and EE. Originality/valueThis study provides an important overview of the possible contributions of the pandemic on behaviors and food choices related to the consumption of CF in Brazilians. This information is valuable to support further studies to investigate and treat the impacts of the pandemic on lifestyle, eating habits and behavior, mental health and other factors in the postpandemic period.
ABSTRACT
In the wake of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), many plant material such as artemisia (Artemisia vulgaris L) have received renewed attention as cheap, easy-to-make treatment for many infections. However, the proliferation of artemisia from seeds is often a lengthy process. Here we investigated the role of commercial (Indol-3-butyric acid - IBA, Natural Rooting Hormone Powder - NRHP, Apple Cider Vinegar - ACV) and cottage-made (coconut water - CW and aloe vera gel - AVG) rooting hormone, and water as control (CONT) on the proliferation of artemisia cuttings in a greenhouse experiment in 2021. The survival of artemisia cuttings did not differ significantly (P > .05) across the treatments. The highest number of stems (19) and plant height (138.0 cm) was observed from CW + AVG, and the differed significantly from the others (P < .05) from the others. AVG produced the highest number of leaves per plant (1466), followed by CW (1317), CW + AVG (1278), and IBA (1241). The leaf dry weight was highest in CW + AVG, followed by those of CW and IBA. A similar pettern was observed for the root dry weight. The findings from this study showed that cottage-made plant based (coconut water and aloe vera gel) growth hormone has comparable effect to commercially available IBA on overall performance of artemisia cuttings. This study has great implications for low-tech proliferation of artemisia.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant changes in global sustainability, but specifically, this study analyses the impact of lockdown on health and behavior in the game of football. The 2020/2021 Italian football competitive season (indicated as "post-COVID”), taking place following an obliged lockdown and longer than the normal summery season break, was characterized by very short recovery times and was compared to the 2018–2019 "pre-COVID” season, which had a regular course. The comparisons were about anthropometric and hormonal responses, muscle damage, and the physical performance of players in the major league (Serie A), and were made considering two extreme points of the competitive seasons: before the preparatory period (T0) and at the end of the season (T1). Turning to the results, it is significant to note the following: (1) body fat percentage was lower at the start (T0) of the post-COVID season than at the start of the pre-COVID season. During both seasons, serum CK and LDH increased in T1 and were significantly higher in both T0 and T1 of the post-COVID season. (2) Cortisol and testosterone concentrations increased in both seasons from T0 to T1;however, in the post-COVID season, concentrations of both were higher than in the previous season. The testosterone to cortisol ratio increased at the end of the pre-COVID season, whilst strongly decreasing at T1 of the post-COVID season. (3) Blood lactate concentrations significantly decreased during the pre-COVID season but remained unchanged during the post-COVID season. We may conclude that the enforced suspension period and the consequent rapid resumption of all activities influenced the physical and physiological state of professional footballers.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe advent of biologic treatment (bDMARD) in childhood rheumatic diseases (RD) has changed their evolution and prognosis. Evidence is robust for diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but in other diseases we still have to learn which is the ideal therapy, time to discontinuation and the potential adverse events (AE) in short and long term.ObjectivesIdentify the clinical and treatment characteristics of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases with bDMARD treatment and describe the development of AE.MethodsBIOBADAMEX is a prospective ongoing cohort of Mexican patients with RD using bDMARDs since 2016. We included all patients younger than 18 years of age registered in BIOBADAMEX. Descriptive statistics were used for the baseline characteristics and the Chi-square test to analyze the differences between the characteristics of the groups in relation to the development of AE.ResultsA total of 45 patients were included, 31 (69%) of them female, mean age of 13.3 (±3.6) years. (Table 1).The most frequent diagnosis was JIA 25 (56%), followed by SLE 9 (20%), uveitis 5 (11%), polymyositis/dermatomyositis and hidradenitis 2 (4%) respectively;systemic sclerosis and CINCA 1 patient (2%) respectively. The mean duration disease in years was 4.67 (±2.1). Nine patients (20%) used a biologic prior to the current;23 (51%) patients had comorbidities.The most frequent bDMARDs used was Adalimumab (ADA) in 17 (38%) patients followed by Rituximab in 15 (33%) and Tocilizumab in 10 (22%), Infliximab, Abatacept and Canakinumab were used in one patient respectively.When compared by groups, ADA and Tocilizumab were the most used bDMARDs in JIA, Rituximab the only one used in SLE and PM/DM, and ADA the only one for uveitis.15 patients discontinued biological treatment, 4 (27%) due to AE. 82% used an additional synthetic DMARD, being methotrexate the most used in 48% of patients. Steroids were used by 21 (47%) of the patients with a median dose of 10mg (IQR 5 - 25).Fifteen AEs were recorded: 7 (47%) were infections, 5 of these (71%) were COVID;allergies and neutropenia in 2 (13%) patients respectively. By disease infections were more frequent in patients with JIA and Uveitis;neutropenia only occurred in patients with JIA (p 0.95). 87% of the AEs were non-serious, 1 patient with JIA presented a severe AE and one patient with SLE a fatal AE associated with COVID (p 0.93), with no statistically significant difference between groups.ConclusionJIA is the most frequent indication to use bDMARD as worldwide reported. The AE in this analysis are similar to previous registries in terms of the prevalence of infections, in our group the most frequent infectious complication was COVID, being fatal in one patient related with rituximab in SLE. Our study did not find statistically significant differences in the development of AE between diseases;however, they will continue to be reported and the number of patients in the registry will increase.References[1] Sterba,Y.et al. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2016;18,45[2] Fuhlbrigge RC, et al. 2021;47(4):531-543.Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline characteristics (n = 45)n%Female, n(%)3168.9Age, media (SD)13.3 (±3.6)Index Body Mass, media (SD)19.6 (±4.9)Dx n(%)n %- JIA25 55.6- SLE9 20- PM/DM2 4.4- Uveitis5 11.1- Hidradenitis2 4.4- Systemic sclerosis1 2.2- CINCA1 2.2Disease duration(years) media (IQR)4.67±2.1Current treatment n(%)n %- Infliximab1 2.2- Adalimumab17 37.8- Rituximab15 33.3- Abatacept1 2.2- Tocilizumab10 22.2- Canakinumab1 2.2Treatment duration (months) median (IQR)4.5 (0.56 – 36.9)Treatment suspension, n(%)15 (33.2)Months to suspension, median (IQR)0.66 (0.46 – 1)Discontinue cause, n(%)n %- Inefficacy1 6.6- Remission1 6.6- Side effects4 26.6- Others5 33.3- Unknown4 26.6Steroids use, n(%):21 46.7Steroids dose (mg), median (IQR)10 5 – 25DMARDs use n(%):37 82.2AE, n(%):15 33.3By disease:AE TypeInfectionAllergyNeutropeniaOtherChi2JIA31230.95SLE1101Uveitis3000Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsSamara Mendieta: None declare , Alfonso Torres: None declared, Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos: None declared, Sandra Sicsik: None declared, Iris Jazmin Colunga-Pedraza: None declared, Daniel Xavier Xibille Friedmann: None declared, Deshire Alpizar-Rodriguez Employee of: Scientific advisor in GSK-Mexico, VIJAYA RIVERA TERAN: None declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundHypophosphatasia(HPP), a rare, inherited metabolic disease featuring low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity due to ALPL (encoding tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase) gene mutation[1,2]. A wide-ranging clinical spectrum is often seen due to defective mineralisation affecting teeth, bones, joints and muscles[1]. This disease has a prevalence of 1/6370 in Europe and is often misdiagnosed and underdiagnosed with a diagnostic delay of more than ten years[1] The treatment is often supportive for milder cases and enzyme replacement therapy in severe cases.ObjectivesTo share this case to raise awareness among Rheumatologists.MethodsThis 58-year-old Caucasian female had her first HPP symptom as early eruption of deciduous teeth, along with recurrent dental infections and gum problems. She was diagnosed with flat feet at age five, had a big toe fracture at sixteen, followed by a metatarsal fracture. She experienced leg muscle cramps and aches, affecting her performance in sport during school life.At the age of thirty she began noticing weakness in arms and legs, which progressed over the years. She faced significant early morning stiffness along with painful ribs, hips, knees, shoulders, and small joints of feet when walking.She was diagnosed with Fibromyalgia at the age of forty-four. The following ten years she met numerous specialists including rheumatologist, pain specialist and physiotherapists. She was also diagnosed with early osteoarthritis, pernicious anaemia, hyperlipidemia, functional neurological syndrome, and central sensitization syndrome. She had multiple trials of steroids and opioids, all of which were stopped either due to side effects or inefficiency.A major flare of symptoms five years ago rendered her bedbound for three months, following which a chemical pathologist noticed a persistent low ALP levels and decided to investigate for HPP. It took another four years to complete these investigations due to the coronavirus pandemic.Currently, she is unable to weight bear or climb stairs and must stay indoors or in bed during flareup. She moved into a ground floor flat at the age of 54 and use a walking stick occasionally. By 58, she is unable to work and had given up her own business due to pain, weakness, and disability.ResultsOn clinical assessment, her height is 160 cm, faced difficulty getting up from chair, has an antalgic waddling gait, with a 6-minute walking distance of 60 metre, stopped after three minutes, and had a Brief Pain Inventory pain severity score of 7/10. Her ALP level is 24 U/L and PLP/PA ratio is 18.8 (ref < 5), and genetic testing showed heterozygous missense variant of ALPL gene mutation.ConclusionIt took more than forty years to reach a conclusive diagnosis of childhood onset HPP. Low ALP level is a signature of HPP and warrants investigations. Diagnosis can be challenging due to the rareness and variable presentation, however recognition of HPP features is crucial for timely referral, optimal disease management and potential improvement in quality of life.References[1]Högler W, Langman C, Gomes da Silva H, Fang S, Linglart A, Ozono K, Petryk A, Rockman-Greenberg C, Seefried L, Kishnani PS. Diagnostic delay is common among patients with hypophosphatasia: initial findings from a longitudinal, prospective, global registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 14;20(1):80. doi:10.1186/s12891-019- 2420-8. PMID: 30764793;PMCID: PMC6376686.[2]Injean P, Lee S, Downey C. Hypophosphatasia May Be Misdiagnosed as Fibromyalgia: A Single Center Experience []. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72 (suppl 10). https://acrs.org//hypophosphatasia-may-be-misdiagnosed-as- ibromyalgia-a-single-center-experience/. Accessed January 14, 2023.[3]Lefever E, Witters P, Gielen E, Vanclooster A, Meersseman W, Morava E, Cassiman D, Laurent MR. Hypophosphatasia in Adults: Clinical Spectrum and Its Association With Genetics and Metabolic Substrates. J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):340- 48. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21. PMID: 30655187.Acknowledgements:N L.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCOVID-19 has shaped the world over the last 3 years. Although the risk for severe COVID-19 progression in children is low it might be aggravated by chronic rheumatic disease or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.ObjectivesWe analyzed clinical data of COVID-19 cases among paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases reported to BIKER between March 2020 and December 2022.MethodsThe main task of the German BIKER (Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology) registry is safety monitoring of biologic therapies in JIA. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the survey was expanded with a standardized form to proactively interview all participating centers about occurrence, presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children with rheumatic diseases.ResultsA total of 68 centres participated in the survey. Clinical data from 928 COVID infections in 885 patients with rheumatic diseases could be analyzed. JIA was the most common diagnosis with (717 infections), followed by genetic autoinflammation (103 infections), systemic autoimmune diseases (78 infections), idiopathic uveitis (n=25), vasculitis (n=5).In 374 reported COVID infections (40%), patients were receiving conventional DMARDs, in 331 (36%) biologics, mainly TNF inhibitors (TNFi, n=241 (26%)). In 567 reports (61%) patients used either a biologic or a DMARD, in 339 reports patients (37%) did not use any antirheumatic medication including steroid.Over the last 3 years, COVID-19 occurred in Germany in 5 distinguishable waves, calendar weeks (CW) 10-30 in 2020, CW 21/2020 – 8/2021(both predominantly wild-type variant), CW 9-27 in 2021 (Alpha variant in the majority of infections), CW 28-51 in 2021 (Delta variant), since CW 52/2021 (several Omikron variants;Robert-Koch Institute: VOC_VOI_Tabelle.xlsx;live.com))In our cohort, patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were slightly older during the 1st and 2nd wave (mean age 12.7+/-3.5 and 12.8+/-4.3 years) compared to the 4th and 5th wave with 11.4+/-3.9 and 11.4+/-4.2 years;p=0.01.160 asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported, frequencies of symptoms associated with COVID-19 are shown in table 1.Five patients were hospitalized for 4-7 days. A 3½-year-old female patient succumbed during the first wave with encephalopathy and respiratory failure. The patient had been treated with MTX and steroids for systemic JIA. Genetic testing revealed a congenital immunodeficiency. No other patient needed ventilation or intensive care. One case of uncomplicated PIMS in an MTX treated JIA patient was reported.The duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated symptoms was markably shorter during the 5th wave with 6.7+/-5.1 days, compared with reports from the other 4 waves (Table1).The duration of symptoms was higher in MTX treated patients (10.2+/-8.4 days) compared to patients without treatment (7.7+/-10.8;p=0.004) or patients treated with TNFi (8.2+/-4.8, p=0.002). Although patients treated with steroids also had a longer duration of symptoms (9.7+/-7.0), this was not significant.ConclusionExcept for one patient with congenital immunodeficiency who died, no case of severe COVID-19 was reported in our cohort. At the time of infection, over 60% of patients had been treated with conventional DMARDs and/or biologics. Although MTX treated patients had a slightly longer duration of symptoms, antirheumatic treatment did not appear to have a negative impact on severity or outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Table 1.Characteristics and frequency of symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 infectionsN or mean (SD)1st wave N=202nd wave N=843rd wave N=384th wave N=1245th wave N=662female14532775432age at COVID-19, years12.7 (3.5)12.8 (4.3)11.8 (3.5)11.4 (3.9)11.4 (4.2)asymptomatic126132694duration of symptoms;days,11.9 (14.7)9.2 (7.0)14.1 (11.6)10.3 (7.6)6.7 (5.1)fever1218541306cough1015652245rhinitis5261344289headache4161227171sore throat61139132musculosceletal pain2751348loss of smell/taste71162113fatigue4882680dizziness122116gastrointestinal symptoms151864dyspnea1117pneumonia11bronchitis1REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of Inter stsAriane Klein Speakers bureau: Novartis, Toni Hospach Speakers bureau: Speaking fee Novartis and SOBI., Frank Dressler Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, Advisory Boards Novartis and Mylan, Daniel Windschall Grant/research support from: research funds by Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Markus Hufnagel: None declared, Wolfgang Emminger: None declared, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Peggy Ruehmer: None declared, Alexander Kühn: None declared, Philipp Bismarck: None declared, Maria Haller: None declared, Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Sobi, GSK, Sanofi, AbbVie, Chugai, Bayer, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, AbbVie, Chugai, Novartis.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundMultisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is one of the most feared complications following SARS-CoV2 infection in children and adolescents. Few multinational multicenter studies from Latin America have been published.ObjectivesTo describe the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of MIS-C in Latin America.MethodsObservational, prospective and retrospective, multicenter study to gather information from 84 participating centers across 16 Latin American countries, between August January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022.ResultsOf the 1,239 reported cases of MIS-C, 84.2% were previously healthy. The most frequent clinical manifestation in our studied population was abdominal pain (N=804, 64.9%), followed by conjunctival injection (N=784, 63.3%). The median days of fever at the time of hospital admission was 5 and a significant number of subjects required admission to an intensive care unit (N=589, 47.8%). A total of 538 (47.2%) patients had an abnormal initial echocardiogram. Most of the subjects (N= 1,096, 88.7%) were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), while 76.7% (N= 947) were treated with steroids, of which 10.6% (N= 100) did not receive IVIG. The death rate attributed to MIS-C was 4.88%, with a rate of 3.39% for those initially diagnosed with MIS-C and 8.85% for those whose admission diagnosis was not MIS-C (P= 0.00001).ConclusionOne of the most significant findings from our study was the death rate, especially in those not initially diagnosed with MIS-C, in whom it was higher. This highlights the importance of increasing awareness and making an earlier diagnosis of MIS-C in Latin America.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients with rheumatic diseases are at greater risk of developing serious infections due to dysregulation of the immune system and the use of immunosuppressants1. Therefore, preventing infection is crucial, with vaccination being the most important primary prevention intervention, leading to a lower rate of hospital admissions due to infections. However, vaccine hesitancy among persons with rheumatic diseases is widespread due to concerns regarding the safety of vaccines2.ObjectivesDescribe the frequency of adverse events associated with vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases.MethodsObservational, descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study was carried out in patients with rheumatic diseases from the Rheumatology Department of the Hospital Regional 1° de Octubre ISSSTE, from February to May 2022;it included patients over 18 years of age with an established diagnosis of rheumatic disease who had received a vaccine;the researcher applied the vaccine-associated adverse events survey to those patients who agreed to participate by signing the informed consent. The sample size was of 95 patients. Descriptive statistics and summary measures were employed for analysis. We used the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (when <5) for the comparative analysis of the frequencies of nominal qualitative variables. P<0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThe survey was applied to 115 patients. 85.2% were women;mean age 57.9 years;61.7% had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 13.9%. 55.6% of the patients were treated with steroids, 52.2% received bDMARDs and 48.7% csDMARDs. Patients received various vaccines, of which the most frequent was the one for COVID-19, with 99.1% of included patients having received at least one dose, followed by influenza in 30.4%. 78% of the patients who received at least one dose of a vaccine against COVID-19 presented ≥1 adverse events. The disease in which the highest frequency of adverse events occurred was RA, without this difference being statistically significant (Table 1). The adverse events according to the type of COVID-19 vaccine were the following: Sputnik-V 80%, Pfizer 76.6% and AstraZeneca 76.1%, without statistically significant difference between vaccine types. The most frequently occurring adverse events were injection site pain (80.1%), headache (30.7%), and fatigue (30.7%);In addition, the main vaccine-associated musculoskeletal symptoms were joint pain, myalgia, and morning joint stiffness (Figure 1), which on most cases improved after a NSAID use. Joint pain was more frequent after the second dose of certain vaccine types.Table 1.Frequency of AE after COVID-19 vaccination in patients according to disease.AE (%)pRA560.790SLE140.326Spondyloarthritis40.068Osteoarthritis60.614ConclusionVaccination-associated AE occurred more frequently than reported in international studies;however, they were not more serious. Providing this information to patients is important to improve vaccine acceptance. In addition, the administration of NSAID after the application of the vaccine could be proposed to reduce the presence of side effects.References[1]Rotondo, Cinzia, et. al. Preliminary Data on Post Market Safety Profiles of COVID 19 Vaccines in Rheumatic Diseases: Assessments on Various Vaccines in Use, Different Rheumatic Disease Subtypes, and Immunosuppressive Therapies: A Two-Centers Study. Vaccines, 2021;9(7):730-440.[2]Furer, Victoria, et. al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:39–52.AcknowledgementsTo the residents and staff at HR 1 Octubre for their help in compilating data.Disclosure of InterestsDaniel Xavier Xibille Friedmann Speakers bureau: GSK, Lilly, UCB, Paid instructor for: GSK, Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: GSK, Lilly, UCB, Vanessa Balderas Reyes: None declared, María Olvera: None declared, María Alcocer León: None declared, ALFREDO ALEXANDRI REYES SALINAS Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Janssen, ovartis, Minerva Rodríguez Falcón: None declared, Sandra Miriam Carrillo Vazquez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen, UCB, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Janssen, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, UCB.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination campaigns successfully impacted on viral spreading and in particular on clinical course of the disease. However, secondary to a highly extended vaccination program, several local and systemic adverse events associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Pericarditis and myocarditis are examples of cardiac complications related to these vaccines. In particular, cases of pericarditis have occurred after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (mostly secondary to vaccination with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech), especially in male adolescents and young adults, more often after the second dose. The incidence is approximately of 1-2 cases/100.000.ObjectivesAim of our study was to study the clinical profile of pericarditis occurred within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccines in our clinic.MethodsWe present a case series of patients who developed pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in the Department of Internal Medicine at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Milan, followed from December 1, 2021 to April 15, 2022.ResultsTwenty-five individuals, of which 18 (72%) were women and 7 (28%) were males, had vaccine related pericarditis. Two patients were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 2 with Moderna, the remaining with Pfizer-BioNTech. Median age was of 42 years. Of all patients, one subject was affected by constrictive effusive pericarditis, while another required treatment of pericarditis with Anakinra, switched to Canakinumab after severe skin reactions, because of failure of therapeutic response to first-line treatments.Two patients required hospital admission, in one case for a transient constrictive pericarditis. In the remaining cases clinical symptoms associated with post-vaccines pericarditis were mild and didn't require hospitalization.Chest pain was reported in 100% of cases, whereas pericardial effusion (in one case larger than 10 mm) was evidenced in 30% of subjects. Eighty percent of patients experienced tachycardia, whereas 90% reported asthenia.An increase in indices of inflammation (CRP) was documented in 50% of patients, usually mild.With regard to therapy, 90% of patients were treated with NSAIDs, 95% with colchicine, while 50% of cases required treatment with low-dose steroids.ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination induces a particular form of pericarditis, often insidious and very troublesome, but with good prognosis. The clinical phenotype showed less typical chest pain, often normal indices of inflammation and little or no instrumental changes, but patients often experimented tachycardia and functional limitation. With regard to therapy, we used NSAIDs at adequate dosages to control the clinical condition, or low-dose colchicine. Low doses of cortisone (e.g., prednisone 5-10 mg a day) were useful in the presence of marked asthenia or systemic symptoms. Beta-blockers or ivabradine were used in the presence of tachycardia.References[1]Barda N, Children 2021, 8(7), 607;Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 in a Nationwide setting. N Engl J med 2021;385:1078-1090.[2]Diaz GA, Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination for COVID-19. JAMA 2021;326 (12): 1210-1212.[3]Bibhuti D, Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Know So Far?. Children 2021, 8(7), 607.[4]Giacomo Maria Viani, Patrizia Pedrotti, Romano Seregni, and Brucato Antonio;Effusive–constrictive pericarditis after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (Comirnaty): a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6(2), 1–6.[5]Francesco Perna, Elena Verecchia, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Laura Gerardino, Antonio Brucato, and Raffaele Manna;Rapid resolution of severe pericardial effusion using anakinra in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-related acute pericarditis relapse:a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6, 1–6.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Topics include the conflicting evidence on the efficacy of corticosteroids with the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 trials;and the potential benefits and risks associated with corticosteroid use which will decrease the need for mechanical ventilation, with a higher rate of hospital readmission.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic is still a public health emergency of international concern. However, whether pregnancy and menopause impact the severity of COVID-19 remain unclear. AIM: This study is performed to investigate the truth. DESIGN: Study appraisal and Synthesis follows PRISMA guideline. Meta-analysis is performed in random-effects model. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, Central, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO COVID-19 database, and WHO-ICTRP are searched until March 28 2023. RESULTS: In total, 57 studies (4,640,275 COVID-19 women) were analyzed. Pregnant women were at a lower risk of severe COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and disease mortality compared to those nonpregnant women with comparable comorbidities. In contrast, pregnant women with more prepregnancy comorbidities were at a higher risk of severe COVID-19, ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). In addition, pregnant women with pregnancy complications had a significantly increased risk of severe COVID-19 and ICU admission. Menopause increased COVID-19 severity, IMV requirement and disease mortality. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) inhibited COVID-19 severity in postmenopausal women. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women had a lower chance of severe illness than age-matched men. The impact of pregnancy on COVID-19 severity was significant in Americans and Caucasians, while the effect of menopause on COVID-19 severity was only significant in Chinese. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy and menopause are protective and risk factors for severe COVID-19, respectively. The protective role of pregnancy on COVID-19 is minimal and could be counteracted or masked by prepregnancy or pregnancy comorbidities. The administration of estrogen and progesterone may prevent severe COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) is a steroid hormone produced in the adrenal cortex. It is important for the functioning of the human body because it is involved in the proper functioning of the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Abnormal DHEA-S blood levels are de-scribed in many pathological processes, such as breast cancer, COVID-19 and depression. There-fore, its potential role in the treatment of certain disorders, including persistent perimenopausal symptoms in women, is under consideration. This publication summarizes the research on DHEA-S, its physiology and clinical application.
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of adolescent obesity has risen globally, and it still shows an increasing trend. Adolescent obesity is also related to many chronic diseases, such as metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Obesity at a young age may also lead to psychological problems in teenagers. It's important to identify the causes of adolescent obesity to better prevent and treat it. This article focuses on finding different factors that lead to adolescent obesity using the previous data and research results. It is found that individual factors, social factors, and COVID-19 can all affect adolescent obesity. Individual factors include genetics, gut microbiota, hormones, and physical activities. Adolescent obesity can also be influenced by social factors such as diets, psychology, and eating behaviors. During the pandemic, COVID-19, lockdown, and quarantine all contributed to adolescent obesity. © 2023 SPIE.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Globally, the case fatality ratio is more in males versus females. Some studies have suggested estrogen hormone decreases susceptibility to SARS CoV-2. We have analyzed the observed sex differences in COVID-19 behavior in males and females and the clinical profiles of females of different age groups of COVID-19 patients and discussed their symptoms, laboratory evaluations, and associated comorbidities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients were tested for COVID-19 through real-time RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) assay. The data obtained were studied for the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics from their medical records. RESULTS: The mortality rate in females was 12.33% (36/292) whereas mortality in males was 19.63% (84/428). In between group analysis, 8.7% (14/161) of females died in the <40 years age group versus 16.8% (22/131) in more than 40 years age group whereas in males, the mortality was 13.7% (21/153) in <40 years versus 22.9%(63/275). The mortality rate in women older than 40 years was greater than mortality in younger females emphasizing the protection provided by estrogen hormone in them. The proportion of patients who expired due to COVID-19 significantly differs by age cutoff of 40 years, X2 (1, n=428). The difference is statistically significant at P < 0.05. Males more than 40 years are more likely to expire. CONCLUSION: Sex-related differences in coronavirus pandemic have been found pointing toward the protective role of estrogen hormone and other differences in immunological behavior in males and females. Downregulation of ACE2 expression, thereby reducing viral entry, might also be contributory to decreasing mortality in females.
ABSTRACT
Autoimmune diseases are a group of different inflammatory disorders characterized by systemic or localized inflammation, affecting approximately 0.1–1% of the general population. Several studies suggest that genetic risk loci are shared between different autoimmune diseases and pathogenic mechanisms may also be shared. The strategy of performing differential gene expression profiles in autoimmune disorders has unveiled new transcripts that may be shared among these disorders. Microarray technology and bioinformatics offer the most comprehensive molecular evaluations and it is widely used to understand the changes in gene expression in specific organs or in peripheral blood cells. The major goal of transcriptome studies is the identification of specific biomarkers for different diseases. It is believed that such knowledge will contribute to the development of new drugs, new strategies for early diagnosis, avoiding tissue autoimmune destruction, or even preventing the development of autoimmune disease. In this review, we primarily focused on the transcription profiles of three typical autoimmune disorders, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (destruction of pancreatic islet beta cells), systemic lupus erythematosus (immune complex systemic disorder affecting several organs and tissues), and multiple sclerosis (inflammatory and demyelinating disease of the nervous system). © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014, 2022.
ABSTRACT
At its introduction in the management of pediatric asthma, montelukast was regarded as a potentially revolutionary drug due to its mechanism of action and easy clinical applicability. Nevertheless, its use in daily practice and evidence from clinical trials have shown that, rather than a radical change in the approach to asthmatic children, montelukast more likely represents a second-line medication that is useful when inhaled steroids alone fail in providing adequate symptom control. Furthermore, increasingly reported side effects have raised concerns regarding its safety. In the last decade, several studies have tried to better define the strengths and drawbacks of montelukast both in preschool wheezing and school-age asthma. The present review summarizes the literature published on this topic since 2010, highlighting the often-controversial results and the unanswered questions regarding the role of montelukast in pediatric asthma. Moreover, advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of action of montelukast are reported. The main finding emerging from the present analysis is that montelukast application is likely to be useful in a subset of asthmatic children rather than in large groups of patients. Future studies should focus on the identification of biomarkers able to predict which patients will benefit from montelukast to achieve a more tailored prescription.
ABSTRACT
Background: Although the negative impact on fertility of men recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been suggested, there is insufficient evidence, and the data are limited and contradictory. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the sex-related hormones, semen parameters, erectile dysfunction (ED), and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in a cohort of men who recovered from COVID-19 and age-matched control men. Methods: Semen samples were collected from twenty-two men recovered from COVID-19 with a median time of 91.5 days and thirty-six control males. The semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual to examine and process human semen. The blood samples were collected to assess the male hormone profile. ED and LUTS were evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), respectively. Results: The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (3.819±1.515 IU/L), luteinizing hormone (LH) (4.023±1.792 IU/L), prolactin (PRL) [12.60 (10.72-15.20) ng/mL], and testosterone (T) [4.345 (3.565-5.525) ng/mL] levels were at normal range in all males enrolled in the study. Levels of semen volume (control: 2.5 mL vs. COVID-19: 1.9 mL; P<0.05) and sperm concentration (control: 59×106/mL vs. COVID-19: 41.5×106/mL; P<0.005) were significantly lower in males recovered from COVID-19, but still technically well within normal regardless of WHO edition. All variables were examined through logistic regression analysis, demonstrating that only sperm concentration was an independent variable associated with men recovered from COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR) =1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.999-1.098; P=0.016]. According to correlation analysis, there was no correlation between sperm concentration and other semen parameters and sex-related hormone profiles. Furthermore, an absence of ED and LUTS in men who recovered from COVID-19 was evidenced using the IIEF-5 and IPSS, respectively. Conclusions: Reproductive-age males recovered from COVID-19 have normal sperm concentration. Sperm concentration did not correlate with other semen parameters, sex-related hormones, IIEF-5, and IPSS. Further studies should be performed to evaluate whether the lower sperm concentration and semen volume that were still within the normal range are a transient or prolonged downregulation resulting from the COVID-19 attack.